First he clapped… then he sacked

But it doesn’t stop there… at sacking NHS/Carers; this Government have not ruled out that in the future they could be banning un-boostered/unvaccinated over 65’s from public places

Do you remember when Boris used to stand at the door of Number 10 and clap all the carers and NHS staff during the pandemic?

Religiously, every Thursday night at 8pm we clapped and praised our NHS and Caring Staff… unknowing that if we could fast-forward to November 11th 2001 those we were clapping for would be sacked.

Irrespective of whether you are jabbed or not… you can still get Covid, you can still spread it. And carers and nhs personnel are routinely checked. Having the jabs and boosters doesn’t stop you getting Covid.

Hospitals are full of patients who’ve been double jabbed suffering from Covid.

Carer’s today up and down this country are facing the sack if they refuse the Covid Vaccine. And from April 2022 those workers in the NHS will be sacked if they refuse the jabs.

But it doesn’t just stop there … threats are being made to the Over 65’s that in the future the Government might rule that we wouldn’t be allowed out in public if we didn’t have our boosters and jabs.

After the atrocities of Word War II and the Nuremberg trials, a code of practice was agreed. Principle 1 states:

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

I am not against vaccinations… if you want the Covid vaccinations and boosters… that is your choice…

What I am opposed to is being forced to have a vaccination you don’t want in order to keep your job.

We must stand firm and say #enoughisenough

First he clapped, then he sacked.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.